|
Post by langford on Sept 22, 2021 20:43:59 GMT -5
Not sure if this the right forum for my post, but I'll give a shot.
For the past little while, my YouTube experience has been overloaded with ads for "midi chord packs." As far as I can tell, these are pre-configured chord sequences that "producers" can drag and drop into their workstations and manipulate to create songs.
I was dismissive of the chord packs at first. They seemed like an off-the-rack approach to making music. No skill required, just line up at the buffet.
But then I started thinking about all the standard chord progressions etc. we use in making music the old-fashioned way. Is it really any different? After all, it's the melody and the words that really make the song, at least IMO. So how is writing a good melody over, say, a I-vi-ii-V on a guitar any different than dragging and dropping a midi version of the same progression into a computer program?
I have mixed feelings. Part of it is that I don't get what the kids are dancing to these days. *sigh* In some respects, I still think its cheating. But if someone uses these tools and still comes up with great melodies, lyrical stories, and clever arrangements, they're being every bit as musical as someone with a guitar or a piano, right? They're just using a different instrument. Or maybe they really are cheating.
What say the regulars at Moe's?
|
|
|
Post by ninworks on Sept 23, 2021 6:02:52 GMT -5
I have seen that on YouTube as well. I think of that as a way inexperienced musicians and writers can write songs but it does make sense from a chord sequence commonality standpoint. As for me, I'm always looking for a way to inject something into the chords that will take them to another place or have a different color than common ones but I use the same old ones more often than not. When I do that I try to find some way to connect them that may be a bit different.
Would I ever use that program? No, but I can see how it could be useful to someone less experienced.
|
|
|
Post by langford on Sept 23, 2021 6:54:14 GMT -5
I'm in your camp, Nin. I like to play around with voicings, substitutions, modulations etc. in chord progressions so that movement between chords sounds interesting or fresh (at least to my ears). The ability to do that comes from understanding an instrument and knowing a modest dollop of music theory. I'm curious to know how far these chord packs go in letting users experiment/edit with progressions. I suspect midi editing is more labour intensive than knowing how to voice/substitute/borrow a chord.
|
|
|
Post by ninworks on Sept 23, 2021 18:05:09 GMT -5
I suspect midi editing is more labour intensive than knowing how to voice/substitute/borrow a chord. Yes, but MIDI editing doesn't require having the ability to play an instrument. The way I think about it is that anyone using said chord pack is probably not going to have a lot of musical training under their hat. A lot of EDM guys don't really "play" an instrument and do all of their composing using a piano roll style MIDI editor program or with a small MIDI keyboard that only has an octave or so on it. I would suspect there are a number of people in other genres that do the same.
|
|